AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

Training neglected in cash injection

15th March 2001, Page 6
15th March 2001
Page 6
Page 6, 15th March 2001 — Training neglected in cash injection
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

• Training and enforcement have emerged as the Cinderellas of industry as the government finally reveals the breakdown of the £55m ringfenced funds designed to modernise road haulage.

A massive E3l:1m has been allocated to allow haulers to retrofit particulate traps to vehicles: another 2.15m has been set aside to disseminate advice on fuel economy. But training will only receive £5m and enforcement has been given £3m.

Mercedes-Benz has slammed this allocation, arguing that the sums for training and fuel economy should have been swapped. The Road Haulage & Distribution Training Council and the Transport & General Workers Union also say training should have received a larger slice of the cake, which includes:

• £15m for free on-site fuel economy training by specialist advisers from the autumn to help operators save as much as 10% on fuel bills;

• £30m on grants to retrofit continuous regenerating traps;

• nm on enforcement; the Vehicle Inspectorate will spend its share of the cake on 12 new mobile roller brake-testers, enhancing its computerised database and advertising its hotline for whistleblowers. • £5m on training; assistance will be given to support modern apprenticeships, the Young Driver scheme and transferable training loans.

• £2m on other measures to promote modernisation and best practice.

England will get £81m of the 2100m fund leaving Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland to share the other 219m. Proposals announced so far cover the first two years of the fund for England.

• See News Analysis, page 8, and Comment, page 6.


comments powered by Disqus