AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

• SUSPENSION AND HANDLING

15th December 1988
Page 50
Page 50, 15th December 1988 — • SUSPENSION AND HANDLING
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

To give the Ducato Maxi a bit more strength than the low-roof, shortwheelbase derivatives, the front frame, floor pan, side panels, and roof have been uprated. Larger front brakes, wheel rims, and bigger dampers are also fitted. The result is a strong monocoque with reasonable suspension travel that handles the bumps well.

Taking corners with a full load results in some understeer, but the van has neutral handling and once in a corner the suspension soaks up the bumps and the steering remains light.

Unladen, the Ducato's rigid beam rear axle hops about on poor roads, but the 16-inch rear wheels retain their grip.

Other manufacturers, look askance at front-wheel drive but the acceleration times prove that the traction is there. There is a strong self-centring action under hard acceleration, but otherwise the FWD system works very well, considering the van's gross weight.

Only if the van is driven off-road does the front-wheel drive cause any problems, as weight transfer to the rear wheel takes the grip away from the front, an the tyres scrabble uselessly for grip.

Tags


comments powered by Disqus