RIGHT OF ENTRY
Page 21
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
One of the legal facts highlighted by VOSA being refused access to ports is that it does not have the same rights of access as police or customs.
But although entry is sometimes refused, the lack of cooperation from ports can be overstated. All ports appear anxious to foster good relations with VOSA, even if they have to balance this with protecting their commercial interests.
For example, although MPs were told by VOSA that Liverpool, run by Peel Ports, was one of those that had refused it access, a Peel spokesman was keen to stress its co-operation with VOSA was mutual, cordial and continual.
He says: "In short, the Port of Liverpool has been and is continuing to work with VOSA to accommodate inspections (more regular than weekly) or the dock estate" The spokesman adds that on 25 March, VOSA and the port worked together on a mobile vehicle check, after which VOSA thanked the port for its help.
The spokesman says: "In 10 separate days over the period 10 February to 5 March, the figures are: 42 HGVs checked, 32 prohibition orders (all types), one fixed penalty notice, eight offences reported for summons."
Still the port clearly wants to have some say in where and when the checks take place, which is where diplomacy becomes necessary.