AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

Fine reduced to

14th April 1972, Page 45
14th April 1972
Page 45
Page 45, 14th April 1972 — Fine reduced to
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

-2-p on appeal • At Lincoln Crown Court there was an appeal by Machins Transport (Surfleet) Ltd haulage contractor, of Surfleet Bank Surfleet (Lines) against a conviction at East Elloe magistrates' court on a charge of using a lorry with inefficient indicators for which a £5 fine was imposed. It was stated for the company that the lights were working when the lorry left the depot but after an accident it was found the two rear indicator lamps had fused. The appeal was being made it was stated, because a conviction might have an adverse effect on the company when application was made for the renewal of its licence to the Licencing Authority. The appeal was dismissed but the fine was reduced from £5 to 14-p with no order as to costs,


comments powered by Disqus