1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188 
BRC warns that road charging must not be hijacked as a 'general tax'
Page 9
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
THE BRITISH RETAIL Consortium (BRC) fears that local authorities will begin to introduce road charging schemes simply to raise revenue unless the Transport Secretary retains a power of veto over such projects.
The BRC made its comments as part of the consultation on the Draft Local Transport Bill, which ended on Friday 7 September. It believes that Ruth Kelly should keep the power to approve Or reject any local road-pricing scheme to avoid a town-by-town 'free-for-all' which could result in a range of incompatible schemes causing particular problems for national retailers.
BRC director-general Kevin Hawkins says: -We believe ministerial oversight is an important safeguard. Ruth Kelly must ensure we get good schemes, consistency and transport benefits when the money raised is spent. "Unless local authorities are obliged to spend revenue from road-charging schemes on improving accessibility for customers, it will become just another general tax and the viability of retail outlets in the affected areas will be compromised," he adds.
A spokesman stresses that the BRC is not opposed to the idea of local road pricing in principle, as long as these schemes bring benefits such as reduced congestion.