AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

Courts reject ignorance as defence in licence cases

13th October 2005
Page 33
Page 33, 13th October 2005 — Courts reject ignorance as defence in licence cases
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

BEING CAUGHT without the right licence has cost two drivers a total of £6(X) in fines and costs.

Mark Elliott, of Lowry Road, Dagenham, pleaded guilty before Bexley magistrates to driving a 7500kg vehicle without a Cl licence.

Anthony Ostrin, prosecuting for VOSA, said a 7,500kg goods vehicle laden with scaffolding and driven by Elliott was stopped in a roadside check. DVLA records revealed that Elliott did not hold the Cl licence needed for that class of vehicle.

Elliott said he did not realise he needed a Cl classification, maintaining that his employer had said that his ordinary car driving licence was adequate in the circumstances.

Elliott was fined £200 with £150 costs and his licence was endorsed with three points.

Leslie Wallis. of Longham Copse, Downswood, Maidstone, pleaded guilty before the Marylebone magistrates to driving a vehicle on a road without the right licence.

Ostrin told the court that Wallis was driving a two axlcd rigid towing a large two-axle trailer with an aggregate weight of 10.100kg, which was stopped in a roadside check. His licence only entitled him to drive vehicles with a trailer combination not exceeding a weight of 8,250kg.

Wallis told the court that he had held a licence for more than 40 years and could not understand why he could not drive the combination when he could do so 40 years ago.

He was fined €150 with:I:100 costs.


comments powered by Disqus