AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

Haulier's Rene wal Battle Lost

13th October 1961
Page 54
Page 54, 13th October 1961 — Haulier's Rene wal Battle Lost
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

THE Transport Tribunal in London last

week dismissed a Wolverhampton haulage contractor's appeal against a West Midlands Licensing Authority decision which allowed the renewal of an A licence with a normal user amended by the contractor.

The appellant, Mr. A. L. S. Harman, of Compton Road, Wolverhampton, managing director of A. L. S. Harman, Ltd., originally asked the Licensing Authority for a continuation of the licence with its existing normal user.

At the public hearing the Licensing Authority decided he was not justified in granting the renewal on that basis, but after Harman amended the normal user the renewal was granted.

The Tribunal President, Sir Hubert Hull, told him: "The Licensing Authority seemed to think he could not grant the declaration of normal user applied for and suggested to your solicitor that if he asked for something different he would renew the licence. Your solicitor asked for something else on your behalf and he got it."

If Harman had customers calling for his services he could ask the Licensing Authority for a variation of the licence.

Sir Hubert said he would not order the application to be reheard.


comments powered by Disqus