AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

Tacho appeal quashed

13th March 1997, Page 12
13th March 1997
Page 12
Page 12, 13th March 1997 — Tacho appeal quashed
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

• A Southampton haulage company, its managing director and transport manager have had their convictions for aiding and abetting drivers to make false tachograph records quashed by the Criminal Court of Appeal, JF Alford Transport, its owner James Alford and transport manager Peter Payne were found guilty of eight offences at Southampton Crown Court last June. In September the company was fined 110,000 with .a2,000 costs; Alford was fined ,f5,000 and Payne £1,000, But last week Lord Justice Kennedy, sitting with Mr Justice Blofeld and Leeds Recorder Brian Walsh threw out the convictions, In a written judgement, the court said there was no prima facie evidence that any defendant knew drivers were producing false tacho charts. In November 1993 police seized records including charts and timesheets.

A comparison of tacho records and time sheets for September and October 1993 showed many of the drivers were being paid for more hours than were shown on the tachos.

The Appeal Court decided there was no evidence to show that either Payne or Alford checked tacho charts against the relevant timesheet.


comments powered by Disqus