AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

If we send a two-man crew with a . heavy

13th April 1973, Page 71
13th April 1973
Page 71
Page 71, 13th April 1973 — If we send a two-man crew with a . heavy
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

truck on a Continental haulage w rney, do both men need to conform with e EEC hours and record-keeping quirements? If we classed the second man a mate — which he principally is — mid he be exempt from the rules?

Both men would be covered by the regulations, and would need to nform with the hours limits and keep :ords of their working hours, assuming it they are classifiable as drivers or as ver and mate.

Anyone who accompanies the driver of a ods vehicle which is covered by the EEC ;ulation (543 /69, as amended by 514 /72) d who takes a considerable part in the eration, helping him with manoeuvres, is issified as a driver's assistant, or mate, d is bound by the hours and records ligations_ The EEC definition of a mate is t very precise, but we would expect it to interpreted as including anyone who uld reasonably be said to be doing a ite's job as it is understood in road msport circles.

A man who, in particular circumstances perhaps the transporting of special uipment — was accompanying the driver nply to advise or assist with the loading unloading at the far end of the journey, d who neither drove nor assisted in any iy on the journey, would probably be eluded from the definition of a mate.

But a second driver who accompanies the st driver, in order to be available for iving if required, is bound by the hours d records rules even if he does no driving the journey.

Tags


comments powered by Disqus