AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

Ratepayers pay for election gimmick

12th February 1983
Page 28
Page 28, 12th February 1983 — Ratepayers pay for election gimmick
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

THE LAW LORDS have made it abundantly clear that there is a world of difference between the use of bus-fare cuts as an election gimmick and reasonable subsidies from the rates to encourage travel by public transport and reduce traffic congestion.

They have found that the Greater London Council's new proposals to reduce bus and underground railway fares by an average of a quarter were based on a "carefully researched strategy for transport in London as a whole" after full consultation. That is a far cry from the rabid "Fares Fair" ploy.

So after the ratepayers have been milked for costly litigation and steeply increased fares since the Law Lords ruled fares unfair in December, 1981, the level of fares will revert in May to that which existed before Dave Wetzel, chairman of the transport committee, and his playmates at County Hall (better known as Livingstone's Folly) monkeyed about with them. What a way to run a railway!

Tags

Organisations: Greater London Council
People: Dave Wetzel
Locations: London

comments powered by Disqus