1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178 
Firm and driver fined over weekly rest
Page 35
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
PERMITTING A DRIVER to take insufficient weekly rest has cost JHB Enfield £1,454 in fines and costs, The company, of Summers Lane, London N12, admitted the offence when it appeared before the Barking magistrates.
Anthony Ostrin, prosecuting for Vosa, told the court that a vehicle belonging to the company and being driven by Radosi a w Wroblewski was stopped in a roadside check. An inspection of Wroblewski's tachograph charts revealed that he had drivenfor 10 consecutive driving periods without taking a weekly rest — the legal limit was six driving periods. When -Wroblewski had been asked why he had not taken the required amount of rest, he had replied: Boss said to work."
Wroblewski,of Queens RoacI,London Eli .pleaded guilty to failing to take sufficient weekly rest and using a vehicle with an insecure load.
He was fined £350 with £115 costs. The company was fined £1,000 with £454 costs.