AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

Persistent tacho offender

10th June 2004, Page 26
10th June 2004
Page 26
Page 26, 10th June 2004 — Persistent tacho offender
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

is fined for 'buying time'

A SOUTHPORT DRIVER found guilty of repeatedly falsifying tachograph records on overnight runs to London markets has been ordered to pay fines and costs totalling £1,450.

Gerald Peet of Bond Lane, Banks, Southport pleaded guilty to 18 charges of falsification when he appeared before the Leyland magistrates.

Prosecuting for VOSA, John Heaton said the offences came to light in the course of a routine check on tachograph records belonging to Supremecause, trading as Taylor's Tiansport, of Southport. On 14 of the 18 occasions, Peet had clearly inserted a chart in the tachograph after the first 30 minutes of

driving. On the other four occasions, the distances had been even greater before the chart was inserted.

Peet had been "buying time" to try and make his record look straight, bearing in mind that he was expected to do a run from Banks to London and back overnight. He was driving a 26-tonne rigid cartying fresh produce from the Southport area to the markets in the capital. It was clear that he would have breached the drivers' hours regulations, although sometimes marginally.

However, he was offending on more than 80% of the journeys. As a result, the magistrates fined Peet £1,250 with £200 costs.


comments powered by Disqus