AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

No Evidence to Justify A Licence

10th January 1958
Page 44
Page 44, 10th January 1958 — No Evidence to Justify A Licence
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

WHEN Mr. J. Law, Coldstream, applied to Mr. W. F. Quin, Scottish Licensing Authority, on Monday, for an A licence for a vehicle of 4 tons unladen to carry mainly agricultural goods within 50 miles, the case was rejected because there was no evidence of such a shortage of transport to justify the granting of an A licence.

The applicant might have succeeded if he had sought a B licence limited to work for certain important customers, Mr. Quin said.

Mr. J. B. Loudon, for Mr. Law, said that he was employed by his father, who had two B-licence vehicles working within a 20-mile radius of Coldstream. The nearest British Road Services depot was at Kelso, 10 miles away, and there was difficulty in obtaining vehicles at short notice.

There had been many complaints by customers who had been unable to obtain long-distance facilities. Supporting witnesses stated that there was a need for a haulier to carry agricultural requisites and machinery, and that when the B.R.S. Kelso depot could not supply vehicles it had been necessary to hire them from Berwick.

For the British Transport Commission, Mr. P. W. G. Gibson submitted that Mr. Law had put forward insufficient evidence.


comments powered by Disqus