Pee Replies To Mr Norriss

WAS interested in Mr Norriss's letter CM, July 13) about his position as an winer-driver and his reasons for not oining the RHA, FTA or TGWU. I vish to comment not so much on......

Dear Sir

relating to transport matters when the more obvious information routes may not be open to him. Readers' views would be most welcome. M. G. Sewell Hazardous Substances Division......

. ..and The Case For The Rha It Would Not Normally

be our practice to reply to a letter written in the style which Mr Norriss chooses to use (CM, July 13) but he does ask one important rhetorical question. "What," he says in......