1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236 
Transfer of Redundant Business ?
Page 69
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
T"position of a one-man haulage business when the proprietor falls ill and is unable to make arrangements for its continuance was illustrated at Liverpool on Tuesday when Mr. G. H. Cropper, Walton, Liverpool, applied to take over an A licence for a vehicle belonging to Mr. J. H. Plumb. The British Transport Commission objected.
Mr. E. A. Whitehead, for the applicant, said he could not pretend there had been any business since March, 1956, and the case must be put on sympathetic grounds. Mr. Plumb had held an A licence since 1934, originally with a normal user of "general goods. Liverpool and Southport." In 1939, it was altered to general goods, Lancashire," and since 1948 he had specialized in work for Lancashire County Council.
Mr. Plumb was now ill with coronary thrombosis and the licence had not been used for more than 12 months. He had agreed to sell the business to Mr. Cropper for £325. Accountants' figures showed receipts of £962 for the year ended March 31, 1955, and £730 for the 11 months ended February. 1956.
The vendor was an established haulier at the commencement of licensing and it would be hard if he was unable to realize his assets, said ,,Mr. Whitehead.
Mr. G. H. P. Beames, for the B.T.C-, said that although they had every sympathy for Mr. Plumb, there must be no question of bartering a licence. The case was based on sympathy, but the Act did not provide for such contingencies. The vehicle had been off the road and before that had been voluntarily restricted to road work for the council.
Mr. Cropper was asking for a user of "general goods, Lancashire" and was proposing to replace the vehicle with a heavier tipper. The council should have intimated they were willing to employ the applicant if there were to be a grant.
Mr. J. R. Lindsay, North Western Deputy Licensing Authority, said he had to be satisfied there was a business to sell. He would adjourn the case to give Mr. Cropper a chance to see whether the council would agree to his taking over the work. If they were willing, he would require an undertaking that this would be the main work. Only in such circumstances would a transfer be granted.