AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

Irlam cleared on defective brakes

3rd March 1994, Page 15
3rd March 1994
Page 15
Page 15, 3rd March 1994 — Irlam cleared on defective brakes
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

• Tamworth magistrates have cleared Cheshire

kit

based haulier James Ham & Sons of using a rented trailer with defective brakes, which was being hauled by a sub-contractor.

Evidence was given that the thre&axled trailer had been serviced and the brakes adjusted the clay before it was rented to [dam. The company then used it to move goods for various customers for several days before it was involved in an accident.

An examination following the accident revealed that all the brakes on the offside of the trailer were correctly adjusted. However, all three brakes on the nearside were fully wound off, with the spring loaded locking sleeve depressed and held there by each nut.

A vehicle examiner accepted that the brakes could not have wound off accidentally unless the locking sleeve on each adjuster had been jammed open. He could not say whether the sleeves had been jammed or not, but said that there were signs of recent adjustment. He agreed that the only other way in which the brakes could be totally out of adjustment was if they had been left like that or someone had unwound them with a spanner.

Chris Cotterell, the fitter who had serviced the trailer, said that all the brakes were correctly adjusted when the trailer left the workshop.

Defending, John Backhouse said the driver had not reported any defect and the brakes could not have wound off accidentally. That meant that somebody had either illegally wound the brakes off before the accident, or they had been wound off when the trailer was recovered.

He argued that lrlam was not the "user" of the trailer, as it did not own the unit and the driver of the tractor was not its employee.

The magistrates ordered lrlam's defence costs to be paid out of public funds.


comments powered by Disqus