1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152 
IMPROVING THE DEFENCE SCHEME IN YORKS.
Page 70
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
NITODIFICATION in the road-transal port defence scheme, in the Yorkshire Area, was mentioned by Major F. S. Easrivood, Yorkshire Licensing Authority, at a Leeds meeting attended by several hundred operators on Monday. The meeting, organized by A.R.O., the C.M.U.A., and the Leeds Chamber of Commerce, was held under the chairmanship of Mr. A. H. Butterwick, of A.R.O. Major Eastwood said the plan for splitting up Leeds, Sheffield and Bradford on a geographical basis, whereby each city would have been divided into four subdistricts for grouping, had been abandoned.
The idea was tried in Sheffield, but operators there said it was not workable, because of the great disparity in the numbers of vehicles as between, say, a residential area and a business area of the city. Therefore, it had been decided that these cities should not be split up at all, for grouping purposes, and an operator could join a group in