AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

L.N.E. R. "Not S COME sharp comments concerning railway opposition's attitude

29th April 1938, Page 32
29th April 1938
Page 32
Page 32, 29th April 1938 — L.N.E. R. "Not S COME sharp comments concerning railway opposition's attitude
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

were made by Mr. Russell Gurney, Yorkshire Deputy Licensing Authority, during the hearing of an application by Quayside Transport, Ltd., of Hull, at York, last week. The application was granted.

The application was for the regrant of an A licence in respect of two vehicles, which was originally granted in the form of a transfer from George and Frederick Middleton to Quayside Transport, Ltd. When the application for this transfer was heard, at York, in January last, • the Deputy Licensing Authority ruled that the London and North Eastern Railway Co. had no right of objection to the take-over, but could make representations. The L.N.E.R. now exercised its right to object to the regrant of the licence.

Mr. E. P. Merritt (for the L.N.E.R.) said he proposed to shorten the proceedings by intimating that if the Deputy Licensing Authority granted the present application the railway company would give, notice of appeal, and would rely on the evidence given at the hearing of the previous application rather than go through the whole proceedings again.

Mr. Gurney said "I think it is very undesirable and not very courteous to


comments powered by Disqus