Dim-dip repne
Page 6
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
MOTOR VEHICLE manufactu reluctant to comply with recommendations on dipi beam adjustment devices I won a reprieve from European Commission.
The introduction of EEC 1 Approval standards has t held up by the Commissi insistence that dipped-bt adjustment devices be install But MEPs at the Febn session of the Europa Parliament in Strasbourg v told that as yet "not one of member states has laid di provisions making compulr the installation of dipped-bi adjustment devices."
In a report presented to assembly by Danish mem Kai Nyborg, it was claimed "deleting the requiremi ... will ensure that the o provisions in the (Type proval) directive, whose im tance is not in doubt, are eft vely applied."
Apart from adding betw 02 and £53 to vehicle pri manufacturers have cast dot on their usefulness.
"Most cases of dazzle caused by incorrect ini adjustment which these dev do nothing to alleviate," said Nyborg.
But the British Governrr has had a generally favour response to its proposals introduce compulsory dim lighting regulations for all r vehicles, Transport Un Secretary Lynda Chalker MPs last week.
In response to t Government's consultat paper, the Government I received 37 replies in favr with just the vehir manufacturers and o organisation campaigning the mandatory use of dip headlights opposed.
There was a gene consensus this would be useful step as it would ( drivers the option of W. dim/dip headlights at any tirr they wanted to be easily vis without any risk of glare, said.