AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

Camden field work comes under fire

23th August 1990
Page 7
Page 7, 23th August 1990 — Camden field work comes under fire
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

• A Ford dealer has undertaken to move several hundred cars individually, rather than using car transporters, after complaints that its unloading operation was dangerous.

Camden Motors is temporarily using a field near its premises at Leighton Buzzard, Beds to store around 350 cars, because it cannot find anywhere else to put them.

But the delivery operation has been described as "highly dangerous" by the Leighton Buzzard and District Preservation Society. "It is intolerable that the police allowed the operation," says a spokesman.

The police provided the haulier, Carfax of Milton Keynes, with a warning sign after the society complained, but the sign was not used, claims the society. The lane, which links Leighton Buzzard with the A5, is "totally unsuitable" for such an operation, say the society: "If they had to deliver the cars they could have pulled out a couple of fence posts and got the lorries off the road."

It also believes that the field is being used illegally, as it is on Green Belt land and no planning permission exists.

Inspector Alison Macho — who is also a society member — dismissed criticism of the police: "We have had the full co-operation of Camden Motors and there will be no more transporters going to that field after Monday."

Camden director James Mercer said the entrance to the field was widened and strengthened especially to take the trucks. They should all have unloaded from the field, he says.


comments powered by Disqus