1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140 
Fewer Vehicles Sought : Half-grant Urged
Page 56
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
LTHOUGH a company seeking an A 1—k licence for 22 vehicles and three articulated. outfits from Mr. W. F. Quin, Scottish' Licensing Authority, last week, were prepared. to give up another for 29 vehicles, their application was described as excessive -by the objectors, who considered that a half-grant would be enough., Mr: W. ' Kerr, of McIntyre, Ltd., Greenock, the applicants, said that the 29 vehicle? traffic had vanished because of a conversion tp bulk haulage of a customer's, 'sugar. Westburn Sugar Refineries, Ltd., Greenock, the customer, sought to, compensate McIntyre by offering more traffic to Glasgow and Ardrossan, The application was for units to be acquired. A normal user for general goods in .the south of Scotland was required. It was stated that new business had been gained.
Mr. I. Law, for •• Road Services (Caledonian), Ltd., who objected, said that traffic other than sugar represented only 7 per cent. of the applicants' work. British Road Services also objected. • Mr. R. Mackenzie, for McIntyre, said that his clients were prepared to amend the application to 18 vehicles and three articulated outfits. He accepted a suggestion that the normal user should be revised to read "general goods, mainly sugar and goods thereto."
Mr. Quin reserved his, decision.