1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232 
• Express Licence No Ground for Tours
Page 71
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
To hold a licence for a daily express service between two points provides no claim for a licence for excursions between them where the existing facilities are sufficient. This point is established in a new appeal decision of the Minister of Transport.
Messrs. Graham Bros., Newcastle-onTyne appealed against the refusal of the Northern Licensing Authority to license excursions and tours from Newcastle to Blackpool, when renewing existing licences of the same type. The appeal, heard by Mr. E. C. P. Lascelles on March 11, was dismissed with costs.
For the appellants, Mr. T. H. Campbell-Wardlaw held that it was not right that the only operators of a daily express service between Newcastle and Blackpool should not have licences for an excursion to Blackpool. For the respondents, Northern General Transport Co., Ltd., United Automobile Services, Ltd., and the Railway Executive, Mr. J. L. R. Croft declared that the appellants had to produce evidence of need. This had not been done, and they had, in fact, admitted that there was no shortage of facilities.