AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

Taming the

1st February 2001
Page 30
Page 30, 1st February 2001 — Taming the
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

Whatever your opinion of the growing influence of European legislation, it's likely that European trends will find their way to the UK. Urban transport represents 25-30% of all transport costs and has the greatest impact on the general population, so it is a perennial political issue. A regular forum has been organised by the EU to look into the future of urban freight transport, and some of its ideas are bound to affect urban operators before too long. Exhaust emissions are a natural target, but congestion and noise levels are also matters for concern. Toby Clark says you have been warned....

• BESTUFS is the sort of acronym only a mother could love: it stands for Best Urban Freight Solutions, and is the name of an E Uorganised "Thematic Network'—an ongoing series of meetings and workshops—designed to share expertise between countries. The most recent workshop, held in Turin last month, brought together 30 operators, researchers and manufacturers with findings and ideas relating to urban distribution.

The speakers ranged From local authority planners to truck marketing men; topics ranged from the practicalities of using alternative fuels and silencing urban traffic to specifying smaller (or larger) vehides—as well, inevitably, as the impact of the Internet.

Large or small?

Urban delivery operations encompass a number of conflicting requirements: access constraints, traffic, legislation and the demand for more frequent drops all favour smaller vehicles, while cost constraints and the ever-inflating size of parcels tend to favour larger vehicles.

As you might expect, different manufacturers have different views of the issue. Dario Salvati of Iveco's Medium Business Unit told the meeting that, for urban use: "The bigger the vehicle the better—up to 12 tonnes. Beyond that vehicles get too big and too difficult to manoeuvre."

Unsurprisingly, his counterpart in the Light Business Unit, Pierluigi Zanframundo, saw more growth in the van sector, and a requirement for larger vehicles in this class: "Van buyers will ask for bigger vehicles in the future—you need bigger volume, not bigger payload."

Elisabeth Sage of 'ISA Peugeot Citron took a rather different (and perhaps pessimistic) view: she suggested that urban transport is already as good as it can get.

"We really believe that goods transport is already optimised—it's simply a question of economic survival," she said. Sage went on to argue that studies have shown delivery needs are strongly related to the nature of each individual activity: "There is not much room for manoeuvre in the number of trips, but rather in the location of activities," What's more, Sage was scornful of any move away from small vans in the dty. "The use of bigger vehicles instead of LCVs cannot be envisaged without a whole logistic reorganisation," she warned. "Small vehicles are often criticised for taking up road space— but they are also more appropriate for the human panorama.

"Small vehicles are a lot less aggressive than huge big vehicles," she concluded.


comments powered by Disqus