AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

DIY defence cuts fine

18th December 1997
Page 14
Page 14, 18th December 1997 — DIY defence cuts fine
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

• A company director has had his firm's fine reduced by £400 after conducting his own appeal against a "draconian" magistrates ruling last week.

Newhaven-based Network Seafoods and driver Richard Long were clobbered with fines totalling 0,000 in October after pleading guilty to one count of failing to complete a tachograph centrefield and one of failing to return a chart within 21 days (CM 30 Oct-5 Nov).

Director Peter Ellis says he could not afford to pay for further legal representation, so prepared a brief and conducted his own defence at Lewes Crown Court. When told of the charges, the judge asked: "Is that it?" says Ellis. "He reduced the company's fine by £400 and refused to allow the Vehicle Inspectorate's barrister's request for appeal costs."

"Justice has been about 60% done," he adds. "I'm happy that there is some common sense prevailing and I've made a substantial saving, so it was worth doing." He even got a sporting "well done" from the prosecuting barrister after the case.

Ellis would now recommend that other hard-done-by hauliers take similar action. "Just hope you get an understanding judge," he says.

Tags

Organisations: Lewes Crown Court
Locations: Newhaven

comments powered by Disqus